Jerry Maguire

            After watching Jerry Maguire, I began to contemplate the under lying message of love that the film portrays.  At first, I felt the film was very idealist in terms of its execution of character relations and love.  However, as I finished the film I began to slowly change my point of view of the whole film’s view of love, though I must admit that I belief that the film examines love in three different angles.

            The film first introduces Tom Cruise and his soon to be wife, Kelly Preston.  We are thrown into their session of wild lovemaking, which is coincidentally our first meeting of this couple.  From this depiction, both characters are more interested in a physical relationship or a relationship built around the idea of loving someone for what they look like.  However, as the movie progresses we learn that this is most likely the truth.  Both Tom Cruise and Kelly Preston seem to have no emotional attachment to one another, only caring for one another based on their physical appearance and their social status.  It is important to note that in the final scene between these two characters we find that Tom Cruise would be considered the weaker of the two in the relationship, since he shows signs of emotionally caring about one another’s feelings.  Whereas for Kelly Preston’s character, she is incredibly strong willed and bull headed, however, she is able to assert her dominance over Tom Cruise and fulfill her role as the ‘aggressive I don’t take no for an answer corporate woman.’  This leads the audience to view Tom Cruise in a more positive light, due to his fragility since he has just been further knocked off his pedestal since losing his job.

            The second relationship we encounter is that of Tom Cruise and Renee Zellweger.  The relationship they share with one another is a very idealistic.  Their relationship is a perfect example of Hollywood’s typical awkward/cute first time encounter, Tom Cruise helping Renee Zellweger find her child at the airport terminal.  From there their relationship slowly builds, and finally at the end Tom Cruise confesses his love for her.  This whole relationship is completely based on the wonderful fairy tale ending of most movies, where prince charming saves poor Cinderella from her wicked step sisters, but in this setting, prince charming saves Cinderella from her sad lonely single mother life.  Honestly, this relationship seemed very unrealistic.  This is for the fact that Tom Cruise’s character regardless of how far he fell from grace in his own point of view, would not settle for such a woman.  It seems almost out of character, because even though Tom Cruise’s character has changed quite a bit, it is easy to figure out that he is still very aware of how attractive he is.  Most notably in his bachelor party scene where we see a video of his ex-girlfriends talking about him, giving the audience an idea of what type of women he usually dates.

            For the third couple, Cuba Gooding Jr. and Regina King, their relationship seemed the most real.  Even if the audience were to perceive their relationship as the ‘perfect marriage’ due to their close connection and constant affection, their relationship can still be considered to be the most realistic in the film.  In one view point their marriage is perfect, but at another angle their relationship is what we all strive for, understanding and cooperation.  But what makes their relationship so real is how they are both balanced characters, whereas every other relationship is borderline bi-polar.  We have Tom Cruise who is having a serious mid-life crisis, which at times is compared to that of a person who suffers from bi-polar disorder.  Kelly Preston’s character who is overly aggressive and domineering, probably has incredible self-esteem issues and has had to hide her emotions for so long that she is no longer truly stable unless she is in control of another person’s life.  As for Renee Zellweger’s character, she isn’t as bad as the two other characters, but she is still guilty of obsessively looking for a new husband/father and someone to support her since she is far too weak to manage most of her life on her own, thus she is still living with her older sister.

            For Cuba Gooding Jr. and Regina King’s characters, they work well with one another because both actors have chemistry and the characters are able to make themselves vulnerable without looking like they are flailing about on the floor looking for someone to pick them up and give them a direction.  For these main reasons, I feel this couple stands out far more than all the other couples in the movie.  They are the stereotypical perfect marriage, but at the same time, they are characters that we can see as being sane.

Ethnography

Pop Cultural Imperialism through the Eyes of the Consumer

            A retail store is a location that most everyone goes to at least once a week, though most people who venture into these establishments probably do not notice how the pop culture of their society is defining them as they shop.  After spending a vast amount of time working at retail stores and having spent almost all my weekend window-shopping, my decision had become clear.  The retail store consumers had become my subject of interest and of study.  Consumers essentially are not so different from the common person walking on the street, yet their attitude and choices are clear reflections of the role that pop culture imperialism plays.

            During my study at various malls, I noticed that many people would typically go to brand name stores or chain stores that in a way had become a brand for selling certain categories of items, such as Best Buy or Bed, Bath, and Beyond.  Many consumers would typically make a choice between the popular/reliable items or what items were cheaper; this is for the reason that many of the items that are popular were typically marked as being the most reliable.  A great example of this was watching people go to the Apple Store and Best Buy, I saw many customers leaving Best Buy with an Apple computer, even though the Apple store was upstairs.  Another similar incident was that of Jamba Juice, there was a Robek’s just across the food court, but Jamba Juice had a line, whereas Robek’s looked fairly empty.

            Western style modernity does not provide human beings anything that could be considered meaningful.  This is due to the fact that western society stresses the concept of ‘more is everything,’ which is based on providing the consumer more material goods, however these goods do not offer any significant cultural values, thus material goods only focus on our material gain as oppose to growth, mental or otherwise.  However according to Tomlinson, if modern western society is compared to that of pre-modern societies, there is an obvious lack of community, morality, God, and family traditions.  In comparison, western society is now spiritually very poor, which relates to the rising issues of, addiction, mania, depression, low self-esteem, and self-indulgent behavior (qtd. in Barker 164).

            This leads to the concept of, personal meaninglessness, this is the feeling that life has nothing worthwhile to offer, which has now become a fundamental psychic problem of the late modernity (Giddens qtd. Barker 165).  Which comes from the lack of moral pressure that society places upon us, thus with this lack of morality, we are denied the proper resources in which we need to live a full and satisfying life.  This internal struggle stems from the acceptance of one’s routine, be it work or school, which may lack moral meaning, and therefore, can be experienced as empty practices.

            In relation to consumer culture, which was born from modern western society, there is an unconscious belief that the purchasing of goods or materials creates a better life or places meaning in our lives, though in reality it only delivers a hollow object of desire, which cause the average consumer to question their own value as a human being.  With the rise in consumerism in western culture the cares and attention that one has, typically now goes to that of the advertisers and the goods that supposedly make our life better, thus solidifying our problems in a tangible form of commodity.

            Pop cultural imperialism is to blame for the leading cause of issues that are currently plaguing the consumers of modernity.  This is due to the nature of cultural imperialism evolving within western society, since the society is deemed open-minded and liberal it is easy for a new concept to manifest itself upon others, especially in a country like America.  America is a unique country with certain states being so progressive that they have made the leap into becoming ‘melting pot societies.’  In the ‘melting pot society’, it is often hard to find a true culture behind this society, thus leaving a void for something such as pop culture to propagate itself, which leads t domination by the new medium, that being pop culture.  Therefore, if pop culture is given the chance to redefine the ideals of another society it is fair to say that pop culture has turned into a form of cultural imperialism.

            Even now, “companies are trying to find new ways to keep ad-weary consumers’ attention through pop-culture references.  Corporations and marketers are finding new ways to reach out to customers who are bored with traditional advertisements” (Miller).  It is very clear that pop culture plays a huge role in what we buy and what brands we trust, the fact that consumers have become bored with the typical advertising campaign has now lead the corporations to fund a new marketing machine (which is based on the idea that there is such a thing as pop culture imperialism) to reach the masses.

Works Cited

• Barker, Chris. "A New World Disorder?" Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage, 2008. 164-65. Print.
• Miller, Elizabeth. "Pop-culture Ads Grab Attention; Companies Need to Be Creative." The Washington Times 20 June 2007: A02. Print.

Weclome

            Welcome!  As you may not know yet, you have just stumbled upon my Pop Culture blog.  Within this blog I will try to describe pop culture and its relationship to culture as a whole in my own point of view, hopefully you will find my ramblings interesting.

            I have just recently read an excerpt from, “The Politics of Culture,” by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan, chapter 1 to be specific.  Chapter 1 being the introduction to the book, presents many concepts that some people may be aware of, but many of the concepts are presented in such a manner that we are to assume that most people are unaware or misinformed in regards to how ‘culture’ is presented within our society.  Most notably would be the authors’ description of how the word ‘culture’ came to be, and how culture stems from either that of the high-class aspect of society, the lower class aspect, or quite possibly both in their own simultaneous nature.

             Therefore, this begs the question, where is culture created, how does it manifest itself within us, and how does subculture play its part in all of this?  In regards to the for mentioned concept of where does culture come from, the politics that define culture and it’s aspects is the fact that culture originally stems from the upper class.  During this time of modernism, we often categorize everything around us using labels/categories, thus we think of culture as existing within two categories, ‘culture’ and subculture.  Because of the existence of two categories of culture, it is safe to assume that both aspects of culture play a large role in the creation of, ‘culture’ as oppose to culture originating from upper class society.

            ‘Culture’

            Culture without the nationality/ethnicity aspect of itself has many different definitions attached to it, though culture is often considered to be a social expression of life and social interactions within human beings.  Though I feel people tend to presume that ‘culture,’ the word itself represents an idea of a certain class of people, that of the upper class.  This presumption is based on the misinformed who believe culture is defined as having an appreciation for, “art, literature, and classical music” (pg. 1026).  A perfect example of this would be that of the description of someone who is ‘cultured.’  Typically, when people hear this term they tend to already have a preconceived notion of what this person is like, which is typically a person who comes from wealth and has travelled quite a bit, thus giving them an aura of understanding a realm of life that most people have never experienced.

            Subculture

            A culture, which differentiates itself from the larger culture to which it originally belonged, that is composed of a group of people from other cultures.  Subculture can be thought of as an expression of style which pertains to a certain select group of people, whereas culture is an expression of the whole country and or city/town.  Because of this difference, subculture is placed in its own category and studied separately from culture.

            Therefore, pop culture in itself is divided between two different categories, culture and subculture, which is why it has such potential to become ‘popular.’  Because pop culture utilizes both of these aspects of our life, we feel connected to it.  Nevertheless, pop culture can also present new knowledge that can equally grasp us, thus informing us and teaching us of another aspect of life that is different from our own but at same time relating it to our own lives.  A wonderful example of this would be that of, Cheezburger.com.  Cheezburger.com is a site that is dedicated to the process of mass production and information of Internet culture.  Since the creation of this site, Internet culture is now accessible to any person in the world, changing the preconceived notion that Internet culture was nothing more than hackers and porn-aficionados, to that of family friendly culture which can be easily acceptable by soccer moms. 

Here is a clip from Cheezburger.com’s Know your Meme episodic.

• Ryan, Michael. "Chapter 1. Introduction: "The Politics of Culture"" The Politics of Culture. By Julie Rickin. 1026-027. Print.